Thursday, 23 May 2013

Digital Literacies for Employability

We are pleased to announce that Alan Cann (Biology) and Mark Goodwin (Genetics) have been funded by the Higher Education Academy under the Digital Literacies in the Disciplines scheme for the following project.


Digital Literacies for Employability

Digital literacy is an essential transferable skill and some have argued that it should be placed above knowledge work from an employer perspective (Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & McGill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: a review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6): 547-556). Digital literacies have a life-wide impact which is not limited to either the academic or the employment domain. Developing critical and evaluation skills results in sought-after and adaptable employees. Yet digital literacy is not simply about learning from content online this represents a deficit model of education (frequently practiced) rather than skills development. Although there is no universally accepted definition of digital literacy, the European Commission defines it as the confident and critical use of ICT for work, leisure, learning and communication and JISC defines it as those capabilities which fit an individual for living, learning and working in a digital society: for example, the skills to use digital tools to undertake academic research, writing and critical thinking; as part of personal development planning; and as a way of showcasing achievements.

Digital literacies can be thought of in the following hierarchical framework:
Digital Literacies
Competencies are easily measured. Is a student (or an academic) capable of sending an email attachment, or using statistical software, for example? Skills are more subtle and less easy to quantify - keyboard skills, for example (hugely important and almost always overlooked), or multimedia authoring such as producing high-quality digital images or video. But the true life-wide benefit comes from the highest level of digital literacy managing online portfolios of achievement and online identity, and augmenting the taught curriculum with a rich range of external sources. Higher education has done a poor job of inculcating this higher level literacy in comparison to the baseline and more measureable competencies (Littlejohn et al., 2012). Academic staff - themselves not trained in these areas - are not best placed to lead this type of personal development student-centred approaches are called for.

This project takes a student-led approach to the development of digital literacies by embedding digital literacy development in personal development. Students will focus on the development of peer engagement with reusable digital objects portraying employability scenarios based on fictional but realistic case studies - Career Plan A versus Plan B, for example. In the process, they will also develop many other latent capacities to strengthen their employability skills portfolio, such as time management, communication and collaborative skills, and digital competencies. Working in close partnership with academic staff within the School of Biological Sciences, the student team will develop case studies on the Xerte platform portraying student career planning and choices, giving first and second year students an overview of what lies ahead of them and the skills they need to gain in order to achieve their desired outcomes. Importantly, the scenarios will allow the participants to explore the development of a clear career focus alongside alternative options (a Plan B). This fits neatly within existing employability training within the School of Biological Sciences, but extends the current programme by the introduction of a peer-to-peer student-led element. This approach has been highly successful at other institutions, e.g. the digital literacies student champions project at the University of Southampton. By participating in this project, student digital literacies will be enhanced through both the production of online employability resources and through student partnerships with academic staff and other related roles (for example, learning technologists in the School of Biological Sciences and beyond through participation in the University of Leicester Learning Technology Advisory Group).

Participating students will build a portfolio of evidence through using a wide range of digital tools ranging from email and advanced search engine use through multimedia authoring and professional engagement with social media for dissemination to a wide audience across the University and beyond. All outputs from this project will be freely available online via a Creative Commons licence. Although similar work based on career case studies has been highly successful at other institutions, these resources are not publicly available (Myers, L., Gibson, F. & Dallison, K. CASEwork: Careers attributes and skills for employability through case based learning. HEA STEM Conference, 2013). The ethos of this project is that development of digital literacy and employability skills will be enhanced by the knowledge that the participants are working in the public sphere and aiming for the widest possible deployment of their outputs.

Participating students will benefit in a number of ways:
  • Development of high level digital literacy skills including communication and project management skills, directly relevant to their own employability.
  • Development of their employability skills portfolio either independently or as part of the Leicester Award for Employability
To avoid exploitation of the student workforce, participating students will also be offered limited financial compensation for their time.


Experience of applicants
The academic team leading the project has a great deal of experience in training students to use digital technologies and in guiding students through employability decision making. The core team will be supported by learning technologists from the School of Biological Sciences and beyond as necessary, and from the University of Leicester Career Development Service.

Dr Alan Cann leads numeracy and IT skills training in the School of Biological Sciences and has undertaken research in this area for many years. His recent publications include:
Wright, F., White, D., Hirst, T. & Cann, A. (2013) Visitors and Residents: mapping student attitudes to academic use of social networks. Learning, Media and Technology.
Badge, J.L., Saunders, N.F.W. & Cann, A.J. (2012) Beyond marks: new tools to visualise student engagement via social networks. Research in Learning Technology 20: 16283.
Cann, A.J. & Badge, J. (2011) Reflective Social Portfolios for Feedback and Peer Mentoring. Leicester Research Archive. 
Cann, A., K. Dimitriou, and T. Hooley. (2011) Social media: A guide for researchers. Research Information Network.
Alan Cann also has many years experience of developing and managing successful websites. All of the websites he currently manages run on virtual XAMPP stacks running in the cloud. These include the highly popular MicrobiologyBytes website, AoB Blog, and the innovative SciReadr project. Cloud based computing is the greenest solution to provision of online resources and is essential in order to avoid costly investment in local hardware.

Dr Mark Goodwin leads the Employability Programme in the School of Biological Sciences, which has attracted funding from a range of sources including the HEA. The University's Career Development Service has adopted the Programme as a model intervention for their interaction with academic programmes, allowing them to work with employers and teaching staff on a structured set of initiatives as an integral part of the curriculum, and aspects of the approach have already been adopted by a number of other Schools and Colleges at the University of Leicester and other HEIs. Mark Goodwin is currently working with Nathan Pike, Discipline Lead for Biosciences at the HEA, on a review of employability initiatives with supporting resources that will act as an evidence-based guide for the sector. He also has experience of developing online resources, as lead for the Virtual Genetics Education Centre, which was recognised in the Jorum teaching and Learning Awards 2011. We intend that the proposed student-led case studies project will be disseminated in the same way, as well as by traditional reports, peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations - in addition to the work that the student team will do to promote the public-facing online resources. Recent publications:
Goodwin, M, Ademe, G, Pennington, M, Bartle, C and Jackson, P (2011) Engaging students, staff and employers in enhancing graduate impact: Tourism Management at the University of Gondar , Chapter 2 in Patsy Kemp and Richard Atfield (eds) Enhancing Graduate Impact in Business and Management, Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, Tourism, Newbury, Threshold Press, pp.9 20.
Goodwin, M and Lawrence, K (2011) Identifying and developing student aspirations: the role of the personal tutor , Proceedings of the Effective Learning in the Biosciences Conference: Equipping Students for the 21st Century, Leeds, UK Centre for Bioscience, p36.


Purpose and outcomes of proposed work
To be successful in managing the transition from undergraduate programmes to employment or further study, students need to start the process of career planning including the acquisition of relevant experience and evidence early in their studies. Our prior work has developed a coherent Employability Programme for undergraduates on a range of degree programmes in the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Leicester. The programme involves a series of staged interventions:

Year 1 February: Student-Intentions survey and Student-Destinations analysis
Data used to inform:
June: Year 1 Intentions after Graduation event (research and planning)
- intentions, destinations and careers
- what is necessary in a successful application
- what you can do over the next year to prepare (and the support available)
- networking with employers and admissions tutors

Year 2 Follow-up activities and support in preparation for:
June: Year 2 Careers in Biosciences event (planning and execution)
- skills matrix for degree programmes
- application strategy
- CVs, applications, interviews and assessment centres
- networking with employers and admissions tutors

Year 3 Focused sessions and support
Focused sessions to support applications (with support from personal tutors and alumni)

Delayed decision making can have disastrous consequences for career outcomes. By engaging students in career planning and the necessary skills acquisition as early as possible in their higher education career we are seeking to achieve more favourable outcomes. The project will continue this approach but extend the initiative by developing a student-led peer to peer element which does not presently exist and would not be possible to develop without the support requested.

A Student Employability Team (12 members at present) has been recruited from current Year 2 students. It is intended that this team of enthusiastic volunteers will form the nucleus of the student-led team who will undertake the proposed project. In addition, this team will roll over to become the Year 3 Student Employability Team, who will work with the new Year 2 Team to provide a view of employability preparation across the curriculum. There is some online support for our students, which this project will complement. The Careers After Biological Sciences material consists of alumni experience of various bioscience-related careers. Student-developed case studies developed as part of this project will fit neatly alongside these existing online resources. By building on to existing employability structures we will be able to achieve rapid development of this new project and, importantly, sustainability of the initiative and resources produced after the period of HEA funding has ended.

We intend to inform the Student Employability Teams of our plans for the project as part of the June 2013 Year 2 Careers in Biosciences event and to encourage them to start preparing ideas and holding discussions over the summer so that the construction of resources on the Xerte platform can begin quickly in September 2013. Dr Cann will install the Xerte Online Toolkit and prepare training resources for student participants such as any additional documentation required and screen capture how-to videos over the summer.


Timeline
May 2013: Outcome of bid.
June 2013: Announcement and initial discussions with student participants at the Year 2 Careers in Biosciences event.
August 2013: Installation of Xerte Online Toolkit and prepare training resources for student participants.
September 2013 - December 2013: Production of employability case studies and
January 2014 - March 2014: Final case studies and impact analysis of project (student-led evaluation).
April 2014: Final report and papers written.
Subsequent years: Online resources will remain publicly available for a minimum of three years, available for download and dissemination via the Xerte platform.





Monday, 13 May 2013

Dates for your diary

Research The Biological Sciences Pedagogical Research Group (PedR) meets once a month to discuss all aspects of research on learning and teaching in higher education. Meetings are open to all and cross-disciplinarity is encouraged. We would like to welcome you to our meetings, so here are the dates for the 2013-14 session:

17 September 2013 - Jenny Koenig (Cambridge), Maths in the Biosciences
15 October 2013
5 November 2013
10 December 2013
14 January 2014
11 February 2014
4 March 2014
8 April 2014
13 May 2014
3 June 2014
8 July 2014


Subscribe to @leBioscience for announcements of details of all forthcoming meetings.


Wednesday, 8 May 2013

Instructional Design

Nichola Hayes At the meeting of the Leicester Biological Sciences Pedagogical Research Group on Tuesday 7th May 2013, Nichola Hayes talked about programme design and the role of the Academic Practice Unit.

The discussion centred on interventions at programme and at module level.


Thursday, 2 May 2013

Biological Sciences Pedagogical Research Group 7th May 2013

Nichola Hayes The next meeting of the Leicester Biological Sciences Pedagogical Research Group will be from 12 to approximately 2pm on Tuesday 7th May 2013 in Adrian 207e (GENIE meeting room). These meetings are open to all staff and cross-disciplinarity is encouraged. We would like to welcome you to our next meeting!

At this meeting Nichola Hayes, Educational Designer in the Course Design and Development Unit (CDDU) will be talking about programme design.


Monday, 29 April 2013

Students putting science on screen

Chris Willmott Congratulations to Dr Chris Willmott from the Department of Biochemistry who has come second in the Higher Education Bioscience Teacher of the Year Award. The Award was established to identify the UK's leading bioscience higher education teachers, recognising the invaluable role they play in developing the next generation of scientists. This year the top prize went to Professor Tim Birkhead FRS, a zoologist from the University of Sheffield. The competition was won in 2011 by Professor Jon Scott from the School of Biological Sciences.

It was the second time within a week that Chris has been runner-up in a national competition. Last week his video The Power of Comparative Genomics, produced with colleagues from the University's Multimedia Services team, received a special commendation at the Learning on Screen Awards, but lost out to a documentary on Charles Dickens produced by the University of Warwick.

As part of the application process, Dr Willmott needed to produce a case study to illustrate his innovative teaching activity, and a video to expand upon the rationale behind his work. He chose to showcase a task with second year Medical Biochemistry students in which they make short films about the ethical issues surrounding current developments in biomedicine. The best films are made available online via the Bioethicsbytes YouTube channel.


Chris Willmott comments: "It is important that students have a good grasp of the implications of their subject discipline for the wider society. Rather than setting an essay on the topic, I wanted to offer the students an authentic assignment activity where the fruits of their labours could be made available to interested parties and not simply disappear into a lever arch file never to be seen again".





Monday, 22 April 2013

Making An Impact

Impact At the HEA STEM Conference in Birmingham last week the Biosciences strand was by some distance the largest discipline at the meeting, and the School of Biological Sciences was represented by more contributions than from any other institution (plus quite a few others from the University). Pedagogic research within the School is clearly making a substantial impact.


Presentations:

Annette Cashmore, Chris Cane, Suzanne Lavelle: Virtual laboratories and their development as interactive open educational resources
Effective teaching in the laboratory aims not only for the acquisition of practical abilities but also linking of practical and theoretical knowledge, strategic experimental design, evaluation of data and teamwork. These aims are often constrained by limitations of the teaching laboratory space, time and resources.
To address some of these issues we have created virtual genetics laboratories using the 3D multi user virtual environment of Second Life® (SL). The virtual laboratories enable students to explore, experiment and evaluate situations in risk-free ways. This will not replace real laboratory teaching but rather enhance its scope and effectiveness. However, there is little evidence that virtual worlds are effective as educational tools. We carried out research to determine if SL could be used to improve students’ knowledge and their experience of practical teaching.

Annette Cashmore, Craig Bartle, Dan Flatt: Students and staff working together to research and develop university policy: a personal tutor code of practice and an employability strategy
Changes to institutional policy and practice should be underpinned by a sound evidence base. It is difficult to capture the student voice and incorporate this into the process of institutional change. We present a powerful student-staff research partnership approach which we have used to inform and develop new policies. Initially developed to investigate the effectiveness of pastoral support in the University, it was so successful and powerful, that we have used it to develop and recognise employability skills both within and outside the curriculum. The approach uses student-staff research partnerships to gain insights into the student experience and what matters to students and staff. Research teams consisted of students, members of the Students’ Union Education Unit and academic and research staff. The methodology included using questionnaires, focus groups and individual interviews to understand student and staff perceptions, with sharing of skills and research training.

Mark Goodwin, Jon Scott, Maxine Bodicoat: Identifying and developing student aspirations
Today’s graduates need more than an academic transcript to negotiate the transition to employment or further study. Success depends on developing strategic career aspirations and acquiring the specific skills and experiences that will provide a competitive advantage. It is often difficult, however, to get undergraduates to engage with career planning or to make use of the support provided by careers services. To make things worse, what engagement there is peaks in the third year, whereas effective strategic planning should begin much earlier.

Chris Willmott: Treasure or trash? Helping students distinguish online gold from online guff
In previous times, a student conducting research for an essay might have faced the difficulty of locating sufficient background material to inform their work. Contemporary undergraduates are faced with an entirely different challenge. With ready access to the internet, the issue is no longer one of finding enough resources but rather an ability to distinguish between appropriately academic and authoritative sources and those that are not fit-for-purpose. One of our roles as educators, therefore, is to ensure that students are equipped with the necessary information literacy skills in order to make these kinds of decisions.:


Posters:

Alan Cann: Engaging by talking: audio feedback
Students express widespread dissatisfaction with academic feedback. Teaching staff perceive a frequent lack of student engagement with written feedback, much of which goes uncollected. Published evidence shows that audio feedback is highly acceptable to students but is grossly underused. This project will explore methods to produce and deliver audio feedback to a wide range of students engaged in a variety of academic tasks with the aim of maximising student engagement while working towards a framework which increases the use of audio feedback by teaching staff. In addition to looking at student acceptability and effectiveness, this project specifically looks at workflows for the production and delivery of audio feedback to students and issues of efficiency and sustainability for academic staff. Specifically, the project compares use of a commercial system, Turnitin GradeMark (turnitin.com/en_us/products/grademark) linked to the Blackboard VLE, with a more agile, non-specialist solution, SoundCloud (soundcloud.com), an online platform for recording and sharing audio files. The preliminary findings of this project show that although GradeMark seems cumbersome at first sight, it is well integrated with the Turnitin electronic submission system already in use and rapidly becomes easy to use for markers. However, the current requirement for processing paper-based feedback forms used to deliver marks to students and personal tutors introduces additional staff workload which more than doubles the processing time per item of work. This alone makes use of the GradeMark system unsustainable for modules with large numbers of students. In addition, the delays the current paper-based system imposes on return of marks are problematic in making feedback remote from the submission of assessments. Adoption of a wholly electronic feedback system has considerable potential to improve student attitudes towards feedback in general and staff attitudes towards audio feedback specifically.

Chris Willmott: Headlines Bioethics: Engagement with bioethics in the news
Innovations in medicine and biology are frequent items in news bulletins. The reports of these discoveries emphasise the importance of cutting-edge developments and therefore have the potential to generate natural interest in students of the relevant discipline. Additionally, many of these breakthroughs raise important ethical questions about the role of bioscience in contemporary society. Indeed, the Quality Assurance Agency benchmarking statements (http://tinyurl.com/QAABioscience) have identified a need for all bioscience students to engage with these issues.


Workshops:

Jon Scott (& Julian Park): Developing quick wins in improving students’ experience of feedback
There is significant evidence from national and institutional surveys that many students continue to be dissatisfied with their experience of feedback from assessment, in terms of its timeliness, effectiveness in explaining things the student does not understand and in its generic utility, for example in informing practice beyond the current module. At the same time, academic staff often report a range of concerns including, for example, that they are spending increasing amounts of time and effort in providing feedback whilst also feeling under increased pressure to deliver for a range of drivers including deteriorating student-staff ratios, maintaining research output and/or third stream activities. Furthermore, there is the perception of a mis-match between what staff think they are providing in terms of feedback and what students feel they are receiving

Chris Willmott: Making the most of broadcast media in science education (workshop)
Broadcasters spend budgets beyond the wildest dreams of most educators in the production of television and radio programmes. Many of these productions, both documentary and fiction, have the potential to be rich resources for enhancing the teaching of science. For a variety of reasons, however, many academics hold back from exploiting this potential. Some may be concerned about copyright and not be aware of the breadth of legal usage made possible by the Education Recording Act. Others may have concerns about the intellectual rigour of such materials. Many will simply not be aware of the source of clips and creative ways in which they can be used.
 


Monday, 15 April 2013

Making Movies - PowerPoint Slide Shows

Steve phoned me last week and asked about options for making online PowerPoint presentations more engaging. I had been meaning to write about this for a while so this was a good prompt for me to get on with it.


1. Slideshare.net
Slideshare is a widely used choice for online slideshow, as well as sharing documents in a range of formats. It is simple to use - make your PowerPoint presentation and upload it to the site. If you want to add an audio narration, record this as an mp3 file (using Audacity, Garageband or your favourite audio capture software) and sync this to the presentation. Presentations can then be embedded in web pages or Blackboard documents, etc.


Downsides:
All content uploaded to Slideshare is public unless you pay for a subscription, so if you don't want to share our presentation publicly, this is not for you.


2. PowerPoint Slide Shows
In current versions of PowerPoint it is possible to record an audio narration to a slide show:

PowerPoint Slide Shows

There are some differences between Windows and Macintosh versions of PowerPoint, e.g. there is no "laser pointer" option on Macintosh, so you'll have to figure out the details from the PowerPoint Help files.

Downsides:
Slide shows have large file sizes so you quickly exceed your Blackboard quota. It is possible to save a slide show as a video (File: Save as Movie) - but doesn't save sound or animations, mouse movements, etc.
There is no autoplay setting (that I can find) so you'll need to put instructions on how to play on the first slide.
Accessibility may be a concern when using video files for screencasts. A solution is to make use of the Presenter Notes field in PowerPoint to add the extra detail that the voiceover provides and upload the original, non-narrated PowerPoint file separately.


3. Screen Capture Video
Use screen capture sofware such as Camtasia, Captivate or Snapz Pro X to record a presentation as a video. You can then upload the video to YouTube (save it as an unlisted file if you don't want it to be public), and embed in Blackboard or wherever you want.


Downsides:
You'll need the screen capture software.




Alan Cann
Department of Biology